Ann Coulter will vote for Hillary
Could it get any weirder? Ann Coulter is now making the case for us…. Or just trying to scare liberals away from Clinton. You decide.
- Danny Schechter, MediaChannel
A new book by GNN’s Stephen Marshall
Could it get any weirder? Ann Coulter is now making the case for us…. Or just trying to scare liberals away from Clinton. You decide.
February 1st, 2008 at 5:20 pm
She is just looking for attention. What liberal or Democrat would pay attention to what this idiot says. She is a complete psycho. Maybe she can fool the Fox news viewers who vote Republican, but she won’t full Democrats who actually have brains.
February 1st, 2008 at 7:35 pm
can’t really argue with that.
February 5th, 2008 at 11:07 am
for all intesive purposes Obama, Clinton and Mcain are the same candidate.. big gov, big business, war lovers
vote Ron Paul
March 16th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Ann,
Hillary doesn’t need your vote, you psycho.
David
April 25th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Oh ok, so now ALLLLL Republicans are brainless drooling idiots and ALLLLL Democrats are incredibly enlightened, progressive thinkers who want the best for the world. I bet it couldn’t *possibly* be the case that there is horrible corruption in both wings of the government. Read the WSJ article about Obama…he’s got Zbigniew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, Susan Rice, and Danzig as his top advisors. I bet he’s going to be a big change from the status quo of morally defunct politicians! Sure. Ug.
And please don’t get me wrong, I’m not making a case for Hillary or for McCain. Coulter IS right in the sense that McCain is less conservative than Hillary in some ways (not with respect to healthcare…McCain’s plan actually makes sense: let you keep your money and invest it how you want). Obama is only winning because of war weariness; so many people want the war ended that they’re going with Obama because he says he wants to end the war and hasn’t flip flopped as much as Clinton has on the issue, while McCain is saying 100 more years of war.
We need to end the war, yes, but none of the candidates are going to actually do it. Ron Paul was your best hope for that.
In closing, it’s somewhat ironic that a Democrat blindly following Democratic dogma was giving the back of his intellectual hand to Republicans while spelling ‘fool’ as such: full. Just goes to show you aren’t automatically infallible just because you stand behind the shield of political zealotry and ideologues. Your politics have to actually make sense for people of any REAL intellect and substance to give a damn what you’re saying. And frankly, neither Obama’s nor Clinton’s ideas on tax reform and healthcare reform make a lick of sense.
In closing, it would seem that we do have ONE important choice to make this election cycle: do we want to get poorer because of WARFARE, or do we want to get poorer because of WELFARE? If the former, go for McCain. If the latter, go for Clinton/Obama, whichever ends up getting the nod from the DNC.