Comments on: Ann Coulter will vote for Hillary http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/ A new book by GNN's Stephen Marshall Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:08:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Dave Stratton http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4860 Dave Stratton Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:04:48 +0000 http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4860 Oh ok, so now ALLLLL Republicans are brainless drooling idiots and ALLLLL Democrats are incredibly enlightened, progressive thinkers who want the best for the world. I bet it couldn't *possibly* be the case that there is horrible corruption in both wings of the government. Read the WSJ article about Obama...he's got Zbigniew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, Susan Rice, and Danzig as his top advisors. I bet he's going to be a big change from the status quo of morally defunct politicians! Sure. Ug. And please don't get me wrong, I'm not making a case for Hillary or for McCain. Coulter IS right in the sense that McCain is less conservative than Hillary in some ways (not with respect to healthcare...McCain's plan actually makes sense: let you keep your money and invest it how you want). Obama is only winning because of war weariness; so many people want the war ended that they're going with Obama because he says he wants to end the war and hasn't flip flopped as much as Clinton has on the issue, while McCain is saying 100 more years of war. We need to end the war, yes, but none of the candidates are going to actually do it. Ron Paul was your best hope for that. In closing, it's somewhat ironic that a Democrat blindly following Democratic dogma was giving the back of his intellectual hand to Republicans while spelling 'fool' as such: full. Just goes to show you aren't automatically infallible just because you stand behind the shield of political zealotry and ideologues. Your politics have to actually make sense for people of any REAL intellect and substance to give a damn what you're saying. And frankly, neither Obama's nor Clinton's ideas on tax reform and healthcare reform make a lick of sense. In closing, it would seem that we do have ONE important choice to make this election cycle: do we want to get poorer because of WARFARE, or do we want to get poorer because of WELFARE? If the former, go for McCain. If the latter, go for Clinton/Obama, whichever ends up getting the nod from the DNC. Oh ok, so now ALLLLL Republicans are brainless drooling idiots and ALLLLL Democrats are incredibly enlightened, progressive thinkers who want the best for the world. I bet it couldn’t *possibly* be the case that there is horrible corruption in both wings of the government. Read the WSJ article about Obama…he’s got Zbigniew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, Susan Rice, and Danzig as his top advisors. I bet he’s going to be a big change from the status quo of morally defunct politicians! Sure. Ug.

And please don’t get me wrong, I’m not making a case for Hillary or for McCain. Coulter IS right in the sense that McCain is less conservative than Hillary in some ways (not with respect to healthcare…McCain’s plan actually makes sense: let you keep your money and invest it how you want). Obama is only winning because of war weariness; so many people want the war ended that they’re going with Obama because he says he wants to end the war and hasn’t flip flopped as much as Clinton has on the issue, while McCain is saying 100 more years of war.

We need to end the war, yes, but none of the candidates are going to actually do it. Ron Paul was your best hope for that.

In closing, it’s somewhat ironic that a Democrat blindly following Democratic dogma was giving the back of his intellectual hand to Republicans while spelling ‘fool’ as such: full. Just goes to show you aren’t automatically infallible just because you stand behind the shield of political zealotry and ideologues. Your politics have to actually make sense for people of any REAL intellect and substance to give a damn what you’re saying. And frankly, neither Obama’s nor Clinton’s ideas on tax reform and healthcare reform make a lick of sense.

In closing, it would seem that we do have ONE important choice to make this election cycle: do we want to get poorer because of WARFARE, or do we want to get poorer because of WELFARE? If the former, go for McCain. If the latter, go for Clinton/Obama, whichever ends up getting the nod from the DNC.

]]> By: David D'Alessandro http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4571 David D'Alessandro Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:32:10 +0000 http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4571 Ann, Hillary doesn't need your vote, you psycho. David Ann,

Hillary doesn’t need your vote, you psycho.

David

]]> By: Paul08 http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4380 Paul08 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:07:10 +0000 http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4380 for all intesive purposes Obama, Clinton and Mcain are the same candidate.. big gov, big business, war lovers vote Ron Paul for all intesive purposes Obama, Clinton and Mcain are the same candidate.. big gov, big business, war lovers

vote Ron Paul

]]> By: Stephen http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4331 Stephen Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:35:41 +0000 http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4331 can't really argue with that. can’t really argue with that.

]]> By: Enrica Ricciuto http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4329 Enrica Ricciuto Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:20:16 +0000 http://www.wolvesbook.com/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-will-vote-for-hillary/#comment-4329 She is just looking for attention. What liberal or Democrat would pay attention to what this idiot says. She is a complete psycho. Maybe she can fool the Fox news viewers who vote Republican, but she won't full Democrats who actually have brains. She is just looking for attention. What liberal or Democrat would pay attention to what this idiot says. She is a complete psycho. Maybe she can fool the Fox news viewers who vote Republican, but she won’t full Democrats who actually have brains.

]]>