<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Cop, bad cop&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/</link>
	<description>A new book by GNN's Stephen Marshall</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Making Your Event Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Your Event Planning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/#comment-4527</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Meeting planning tools can help shape a corporate event planners success&lt;/strong&gt;

One of the largest problems in corporations today is how to undertake a large corporate event without getting too bogged down with every detail. Corporate event planners are employed to ensure that any corporate event is a success and in order to succe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Meeting planning tools can help shape a corporate event planners success</strong></p>
<p>One of the largest problems in corporations today is how to undertake a large corporate event without getting too bogged down with every detail. Corporate event planners are employed to ensure that any corporate event is a success and in order to succe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zane</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Right on, brother. As Noam says it's not a 2-party system anymore. It's a 1-party system, the property party, with 2 wings of it. 

Sadly, it's becoming clear that the Dems await their time-slot at the feed trough serving power, perks, donations and high-profile, high-pay jobs for spouses.  Few of them are willing to stand up and risk their 2-terms of sucking up the spoils of victory. 

It's sad to see a group like DailyKos so willingly particpate, allow, permit, empower, that co-opting of themselves and their audience. 

What we have now as a form of government isn't one that balances power, but one that trades in the spoils, of governing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, brother. As Noam says it&#8217;s not a 2-party system anymore. It&#8217;s a 1-party system, the property party, with 2 wings of it. </p>
<p>Sadly, it&#8217;s becoming clear that the Dems await their time-slot at the feed trough serving power, perks, donations and high-profile, high-pay jobs for spouses.  Few of them are willing to stand up and risk their 2-terms of sucking up the spoils of victory. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad to see a group like DailyKos so willingly particpate, allow, permit, empower, that co-opting of themselves and their audience. </p>
<p>What we have now as a form of government isn&#8217;t one that balances power, but one that trades in the spoils, of governing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolvesbook.com/2007/08/06/bad-cop-bad-cop/#comment-609</guid>
		<description>"I think the core issue here is that people in the Dem establishment understand that America needs to secure Iraq. They won’t speak in Kissengerian terms in front of the electorate.."

I hope they understand that.  The Iraqi's need a secure Iraq, and it would be reprehensible to abandon them prematurely.  Just pulling out and forgetting about the country like it was never our problem in untennable.  Because it is our problem.  We enforced sanctions and no-fly zones since '91 that included a couple bombing campaigns.  

I fail to see what is enamoring about this conservative isolationism.  It's not going to happen in practice.  It's as if a biologist demanded that evolution stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think the core issue here is that people in the Dem establishment understand that America needs to secure Iraq. They won’t speak in Kissengerian terms in front of the electorate..&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope they understand that.  The Iraqi&#8217;s need a secure Iraq, and it would be reprehensible to abandon them prematurely.  Just pulling out and forgetting about the country like it was never our problem in untennable.  Because it is our problem.  We enforced sanctions and no-fly zones since &#8216;91 that included a couple bombing campaigns.  </p>
<p>I fail to see what is enamoring about this conservative isolationism.  It&#8217;s not going to happen in practice.  It&#8217;s as if a biologist demanded that evolution stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
